Allied Interstate, Inc.
Cases Against Allied Interstate, Inc.
Cash v. Allied Interstate, Inc., 2005 WL 1186189 (S.D.
Tex.
May 18, 2005). Collection notice stating that the debt
collector may send the debt to an attorney, recommend a
law suit, or send the debt back to the original creditor
was not found to be misleading, deceptive, or a
violation of the FDCPA. These actions were legal
possibilities. A debt collection notice sent to the
consumer stating that the consumer only had 10 days to
pay was considered to be threatening. After ten days, no
actual action was taken, so this notice was false and
misleading.
Stebbins v. Allied Account Servs., 1991 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS
21778 (D. Conn. Sept. 9, 1991). Collector violated the
FDCPA by sending a notice to the consumer stating that
the consumer should call the debt collector. This
contradicts the fact that the consumer is required to
dispute and request validation in writing.
Acheampongtieku v. Allied Interstate, Inc., 2005 WL
2036153 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2005). Debt collector did
not violate the FDCPA because they gave the consumer an
opportunity to dispute the debt before they reported it
to the credit bureaus.
Contact Allied Interstate, Inc.
435 Ford Rd. #800
Minneapolis, MN
55426-1066
Phone: (952) 546-6600 1-800-806-3342
1-866-525-7795
Fax: (952) 595-2311
Web Address:
www.irmc.com
Share your experience or comments about this company.
 |
 |
|
Being harassed by debt collectors? You may
be entitled to compensation. Submit your
case online to one of our attorneys for a
free case review.
|
|
|