Arrow Financial Services
Cases Against Arrow Financial Services
Reese v. Arrow Fin. Servs., Inc., 202 F.R.D. 83 (D.
Conn.2001).
Trying to collect on debt past the statute of
limitations does not violate the FDPCA as long as the
collector does not make false threats of litigation.
Bennett v. Arrow Fin. Servs., L.L.C., 2004WL 830440 (N.D.Ill.
Apr. 14, 2004).
Debt collector called consumer several times over a few
weeks, and the court found that this did not constitute
as harassment. Plaintiff was unable to provide
documentation that the interest was illegal.
Gonzalez v. Arrow Fin. Servs. L.L.C., 2005 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 19712 (S.D. Cal. July 25, 2005).
Debt collector violated the FDCPA by reporting a stale
debt to the credit reporting agencies. The collector
sent the consumer a notice stating that if the debt was
not settled, it would be reported to the bureaus. The
debt was over 7 years old.
King v. Arrow Fin. Servs., L.L.C., 2003WL 21780973 (E.D.Pa.
July 31, 2003).
Debt collector offered consumer a settlement to be
received by a specified date was not found to be
misleading or in violation of the FDCPA.
Hapin v. Arrow Fin. Servs., F. Supp. 2d , 2006 WL
1096805 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2006).
The collection notice used the words “customer” and
“account representative.” The letter also included the
phrase “regain your financial freedom.” The court found
this wording to not be deceptive or in violation of the
FDPCA.
Contact Arrow Financial Services
5996 W. Touhy Avenue
Niles, Illinois 60714
Phone: (847)
557-1100
Fax:
(847) 647-9526
Web Address:
www.arrow-financial.com
Share your experience or comments about this company.
 |
 |
|
Being harassed by debt collectors? You may
be entitled to compensation. Submit your
case online to one of our attorneys for a
free case review.
|
|
|
