Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore
Cases Against Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore
Beler v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore,
L.L.C., 480
F.3d 470, 473–474 (7th Cir. 2007) Debt collector failed
to provide consumer with validation. The debt collector
was found not guilty of misleading or confusing consumer
about the relation between J.C Penney to GE Capital and
Monogram Bank. The debt collector froze the consumer’s
bank account, but this act was not in violation of the
FDCPA.
Hamid v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker, Moore &
Pellettieri,
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13918 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2001).
Defendant violated the FDCPA by filing a law suit
against the consumer on a debt that was past the statute
of limitations.
Moore v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, L.L.C.,
2006 WL 1806195 (C.D. Ill. June 29, 2006). The consumer
stated that they never received the initial debt
collection notice, but the defendant denied this by
explaining their routine business practices when
collecting debts. Consumer disputed the debt, but they
did not sent a cease and desist letter to stop
collection efforts.
Contact Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore
Share your experience or comments about this company.
 |
 |
|
Being harassed by debt collectors? You may
be entitled to compensation. Submit your
case online to one of our attorneys for a
free case review.
|
|
|
