Credit Collection Service
Cases Against Credit Collection Service
Miller v. Credit Collection Servs., 200 F.R.D. 379 (S.D.Ohio
2000).
Defendant’s motion for attorney fees was denied because
it was not made within the required 14 day time period.
Melvin v. Credit Collections, Inc., 2001 WL
34047943(W.D. Okla. Apr. 5, 2001).
The creditor did not tell the debt collector that the
consumer did not want to receive any phone calls. The
court did not find this to be an unfair practice under
state law.
Contact Credit Collection Service
Share your experience or comments about this company.
 |
 |
|
Being harassed by debt collectors? You may
be entitled to compensation. Submit your
case online to one of our attorneys for a
free case review.
|
|
|
