Messerli & Kramer

Cases Against Messerli & Kramer

Kirscher v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
2006 WL 145162 (D. Minn. Jan. 18, 2006). Defendant's counterclaim seeking fees for plaintiff's bad faith was not valid under 1692k.

Mason v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
2004 WL 898273, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7278 (D. Minn. Apr. 14, 2004). An FDCPA case was filed in federal court and a claim arising from the same facts was filed in a state court, dismissing the FDCPA claim.

HFraenkel v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
2004 WL 1765309, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15196 (D. Minn. July 29, 2004). Undisputed documents attached to debt collector's answer did not require conversion motion for summary judgment, and consumer's FDCPA claim was dismissed as the statue of limitations had expired.

Wanty v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
2006 WL 2691076 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 19, 2006). Class action of Wisconsin consumers who received a letter from an attorney allegedly not involved in the collection. The plaintiff's bankruptcy had no effect on their adequacy as a representative.

Kirscher v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
2006 WL 145162 (D. Minn. Jan. 18, 2006). Pro se attorney's misrepresentation claim against defendant attorneys was not valid as the statute of limitation had expired.