Minority Legal Network

Cases Against Meridian Management Solutions

Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). Once notified that a consumer is now represented by an attorney, the collectorÍs communications with said consumer violated the FDCPA.

Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). CollectorÍs threat to report to a CRA any unpaid debt more than 45 days from date of placement without explanation of when the account was reported was a misleading misrepresentation in violation of FDCPA.

Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). A third party debt collectorÍs contact with consumers in the name of the original creditor was a false representation in violation of FDCPA.

Hartman v. Meridian Fin. Servs., Inc.
191 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (W.D. Wis. 2002). The debt collectorÍs initial communications with consumers in the name of the original creditor failed to contain the validation notice and was in violation of FDCPA.