Click Here
Rosenthal & Colby, Inc.
Cases Against Rosenthal & Colby, Inc.
Stonehart v. Rosenthal
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11566 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2001). The consumer disputed the amount of her bill because she felt as though the service she received from her dentist was negligent. The bill from the dental office satisfied the court's requirement of proof that the consumer owed the debt to the collector.
Post this page to:
Share your experience or comments about this company.
Francis & Mailman, P.C. is not responsible for the creation or development of the below comments and does not endorse the views or opinions expressed therein.
Being harassed by debt collectors? You may be entitled to compensation. Submit your case online to one of our attorneys for a free case review.
- NCO Financial Systems
- OSI - Outsourcing Solutions
- Asset Acceptance Corp
- NES - National Enterprise Systems
- LVNV
- Aurora Gold
- Fred Hanna
- Mann Bracken
- Meridian
- Marauder
- Midland
- United Recovery Systems
- Collect America
- Capital Recovery
- C. Barry & Associates
- Consumer Recovery Associates
- CMC Recovery
- Bay Area Credit
- Litigation Consulting Service
- Falzone
Learn more about consumer law!
Find us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter. Watch us on YouTube.
