Van Ru Credit Corp
|Address||1350 E. Touhy Avenue, Ste 300E|
Cases Against Van Ru Credit Corp
Frew v. Van Ru Credit Corp.
2006 WL 2261624 (E.D. Pa.Aug. 7, 2006). Defendant violated the FDCPA by using threatening language toward the consumer and referring to him as a “scumbag.”
Woolfolk v. Van Ru Credit Corp.
783 F. Supp. 724 (D. Conn.1990). Debt collector used abusive language to threaten and intimidate consumer. The validation notice that the debt collector provided to the consumer was vague in its direction of how to properly dispute and request proof. The consumer was unable to provide sufficient evidence that the defendant continued to collect the debt before providing validation. With respect to actual damages, even a single technical violation of the Act is sufficient to impose liability, and permits an award of statutory and actual damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1692k.
Gully v. Van Ru Credit Corp.
381 F. Supp. 2d 766 (N.D. Ill.005). Consumer believed that the debt collector’s settlement offer was misleading, but debt collector clearly stated that the settlement offer must be received by a specific date.
Drennan v. Van Ru Credit Corp.
950 F. Supp. 858 (N.D. Ill.1996). Defendant continually made false threats to consumer, but no action was take for over a year after they threatened immediate action.