Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker and Moore

Address 125 South Wacker Drive, Ste 400
City Chicago
State Illinois
Zip Code 60606
Phone 1 312-704-9440
Fax 1 312-704-9430
Address 1225 E. Broadway Road, Ste 220
City Tempe
State Arizona
Zip Code  85282
Phone 1 480-968-6088
Fax 1 602-968-1185
Address  950 N. Meridian St., Ste 950
City  Indianapolis
State  Indiana
Zip Code  46204
Phone 1  317-684-7150
Fax 1  317-684-7155
Address  30200 Telegraph Road, Ste 110
City  Bingham Farms
State  Michigan
Zip Code 48025
Phone 1 248-203-6810
Address 1835 Market Street, Ste 501
City Philadelphia
State Pennsylvania
Zip Code 19103
Phone 1 215-564-1567
Fax 1 215-564-3818
Address 211 Landmark Drive, Ste C-1
City Normal
State Illinois
Zip Code 61761
Phone 1 309-268-4100
Fax 1 309-888-4638

If you are dealing with abusive debt collectors (calling at all hours of the night, using inappropriate language when talking to you about the debt that you owe a creditor, etc), it may be time for you to get an attorney on your side.

Call Francis and Mailman today, we are on your side and get the debt collectors calls to stop.  It is time to fight back against abusive debt collection agencies.


Cases Against Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore

Beler v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, L.L.C., 480
F.3d 470, 473–474 (7th Cir. 2007) Debt collector failed to provide consumer with validation. The debt collector was found not guilty of misleading or confusing consumer about the relation between J.C Penney to GE Capital and Monogram Bank. The debt collector froze the consumer’s bank account, but this act was not in violation of the FDCPA.

Hamid v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker, Moore & Pellettieri
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13918 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2001). Defendant violated the FDCPA by filing a law suit against the consumer on a debt that was past the statute of limitations.

Moore v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, L.L.C.
2006 WL 1806195 (C.D. Ill. June 29, 2006). The consumer stated that they never received the initial debt collection notice, but the defendant denied this by explaining their routine business practices when collecting debts. Consumer disputed the debt, but they did not sent a cease and desist letter to stop collection efforts.

Ratings for
Francis & Mailman featured on Today, PBS News Hour, Super Lawyers, and Philadelphia Inquirer